Archive for the 'Consumer Electronics' Category



305 views

Twice.com Adds RSS, Digg and Del.icio.us buttons, comments

Twice.com
Twice (This Week In Consumer Electronics), one of the main sites reporting on the consumer electronics industry, has added Digg and Del.icio.us buttons, an RSS feed, and comments. In the past, reading Twice.com articles required registering and logging in. It appears Reed Business Systems, the parent company has added these features to all of its industry publications (these are the US sites listed), as well as Reed Business Systems press releases (RSS feed here).

Update 12/23/2006
Sometime between the original post and the date above they have added “blog this” buttons for Blogger and LiveJournal, an add to MyYahoo button, and a submit to Slashdot button.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,


182 views

Neuros OSD, the Open Set Top Box

neros osd
(via BoingBoing) Damn, I had this idea, I swear. But I am glad someone is doing it. The open (as in open source) set-top box, the Neuros OSD running on Linux. This is the beginning of something great. Consumers are finally going to get the home audio device that will do what they want it to do.

The device has not been released yet, most of the good apps still need to written for it. And how will they get written? There are bounties for various apps: Flickr photo browser, YouTube viewer, PVR for satellite radio. I imagine someone will also make a podcast/video podcast downloader/streamer, and Tivo-like video recording features. I come home, turn on the TV, and watch my favorite shows: Ze Frank, Rocketboom, and DiggNation. That would be great. It features Ethernet (wired and wireless), USB. Pre-order here.

What about MPAA/RIAA?: Dream Scenario
You might ask if this company can stay around in the face of sue-happy-Hollywood. If they get up in arms, I have an idea. We can beat them at their own game. What if we (the free culture/hacker/open source/creative commons/blogger/podcaster community) were to come up with a way to tag content digital as Creative Commons, and make it so the device can play only Creative Commons licensed material and fair use coppies? This would be a great strategy to play right at the tipping point of the popularity of this device. When it becomes so hot and everyone has one and everyone is ditching their DVD players and DVRs for the Neuros OSD, there will be a strong demand for Creative Commons material, and traditional media outlets will need to licence Creative Commons. Copyright dies, fair use lives.

Apps: Let the Disruptive Innovation Begin!
So, there are the obvious apps mentioned above. But here is the real doom scenario for anit-free culture corporate stakeholders: built in BitTorrent with data encryption, open and built-in content purchasing platforms (DRM free of course), fair use iTMS iPod content ripper (protected M4A to MP3 converter) that auto inserts ID3 tags.

I did have my heart set on Apple’s new iTV. But why pay more for a device that does less? Why wait for Apple to make the updates that are going to be MPAA/RIAA flavored when any developer who knows and wants to can make apps for it that do what people really want?

Update:
There is a lot of criticism about paying low bounties. Cory Doctorow has replied to one of these critics with some great points.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,


252 views

iPod Games for iTunes 7…iPod Apps?

The other cool announcment Apple made yesterday was iPod games. This means that it may be possible for developers to make applications that run on the iPod. I remember getting really excited about chapter markers, but this is a much bigger deal. Ben Sinclair has taken a look at the .ipg file that is an iPod Game file, and discovered it is a zip file with audio, xml, and image files inside. Apple was thinking what I was thinking when I suggested this format and stuck it on a wiki at suggestions4ipodanditunes.com, and my proposed iiml (interactive iPod markup language) format and intreactive iPod audio file.

Ben wrote to Apple, and they have replied, stating that there are currently no plans for an iPod games SDK. I really hope this is not so that can make it so that the only way to get these files is to buy them. I bet, that in a matter of days, someone will post the instructions on how to hack these applications together. As podcasting was platform that was not intended by Apple that they embraced, iPod apps could also be a new platform that the developer/hacker/iPod user communities will exploit big time. This is the beginning of the iPod as an open source applications platform.

Update:
Interesting read, The Video Game Crash of 1983 on Wikipedia. Do they want to protect the game industry by keeping out homebrews?

Technorati Tags: , , ,


170 views

…but will it do video podcasts?

Apple announced today that they will have a device slated for next year codenamed iTV (great summary, David). The device will be wireless as well as featuring an Ethernet and USB ports. One killer app for this device would be the ability to download video podcasts or vlogs to the device and watch them on a TV. Subscribing to them on the device itself with Apple’s own directory (like their podcast directory) would be great. In January, I suggested that Tivo should do more of this. They were offering Rocketboom at one time. I am not sure if this is still a feature.

Update:
Engadget has a photo of the presentation with Joanne of Rocketboom. This confirms that it can do video podcasts. I can’t wait! I will watch TV again (sort of).

Technorati Tags: , ,


294 views

Dell Needs to Innovate in its Support Channels

Nick Carr writes that while Dell was able to innovate with its made-when-you-order supply chain and direct sales to cut costs, they also need to have a direct support channel, since they have no dealers. And the money would have earned with this innovation now needs to be spent on customer support. They did put up a blog this month.

But there’s another side to the PC business: the support side. And here, the direct model looks less attractive. If, after all, you’re selling directly to customers, you have to shoulder all the related support costs, from handling information requests before the sale to taking and tracking orders to handling service inquiries after the sale. You can’t offload any of those costs onto resellers or retailers or other distribution partners – because you don’t have any distribution partners.

Off-shoring the call center to India is not as innovative at their just-in-time supply chain, and now they are paying the price since this was not factored in. I think the lesson is to innovate in as many areas as they can. One commenter writes that if they let users support each other through message boards and wikis, they might not have this innovation imblanace. It appears Dell does have a community forum. Could a wiki really be the tipping point? Is Dell doing all it can to recommend the support forum to its customers, or is this just an afterthought? Could Dell create a support strategy around using a wiki and looking at customer support as a strategy to cut costs instead of incur costs? Motorola has put up a wiki for its new Q phone. I am eagerly awaiting a report from Motorola on the number of calls and e-mails they receive on this model in comparison to others.

Again, (I seem to do this with a lot of posts) we look at Apple’s strategy. Non-commodity parts may cost more, but it means there are less variables (fewer models) for the support channels to deal with (keep it simple). Apple Stores provide the Genius Bar, a way to talk to a support rep in person. The Apple forums are used by many dedicated users. User experience is baked into every aspect of the business.

Good user experience is not only good for the customer and the brand, but it keeps revenue in the company. As you can see, market share is not everything. I would go as far to say that market share is not sustainable over the long term if your user experience is bad. Who’s the real rock star here, Michale Dell or Steve Jobs? Sure, Michael Dell is the rock star in the supply chain management world, but most end users do not see Dell as the rock star, they see Jobs as the rock star. Jobs’ strategy continues to touch the customer well after the purchase. Dell’s just does it by delivering it to you when you want it, a one time thing.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,


158 views

The Problem With Home Media Servers

The Diffusion Group reports that another reporting body (un-named and no link to it) is reporting that home media servers are set to grow to 150 million units sold in the US by 2010. The Diffusion Group argues that these numbers seem pretty high. They also claim the report does not define a home media player. Are we just talking set top boxes or iPods as well?

Also, yesterday, Sony announced a new media sever here. They claim it can stream media from both iTunes and Windows Media Player, as well as their own Sony CONNET service.

These features and projections are all fine and good, but I think there are two big hurdles to overcome. Being in a position where I help end users of home media servers, I can speak of the user experience problems that some of these product have. If these cannot change, mainstream adoption will stay low.

•DRM
DRM (digital rights management) interferes with a good customer experience. DRM is an attempt to keep formats proprietary to specific players. The industry (the RIAA and DRM media vendors) claims that it is to prevent piracy. Customers do no have th right to choose what file format they can play, they are stuck with the format the the vendor has chosen and/or licensed with. It is a format war, and the customers’ user experience are the civilian casualties. Music purchased on Napster, Rhapsody, and YahooMusic can only be played on very specific devices. Music purcahsed from iTunes can only be played on iPods. Some CDs do not allow you to (or make it difficult to) make the backup copy you are entitled to make under fair use.

•Network Security Roadblocks
Most computer operating systems and routers have so many security measures built into them that plug-and-play is not a reality when connecting to a home media server over a local network. With poorly designed media server software that does not automatically open a clear path to the media along with the failure to fully adhere to set standards (like UPnP or DLNA) and expectation, “home media server” as a brand becomes synonymous with long support calls, networking headaches, bad user experience.

This could be why we do not see a wireless iPod. Network security obstacles would interfere with the user experience. For the same reason, this could be why Apple has their own platform which they have total control over: AirPort and AirTunes integrated with iTunes.

Technorati Tags: , , ,


139 views

When law trumps usability and fair use

Check out this CNet article about how the DMCA is going to get worse. It is all in the name of combating “IP crime,” which in actually is this thing that I think is the American way, and it is called “fair use.” In the article, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales states:

“[New technology is] encouraging large-scale criminal enterprises to get involved in intellectual-property theft, [and] “quite frankly, to fund terrorism activities.”

This has got to be complete BS. Statements like this show you that the terrorists did win/are winning.

IPAction.org is sending iPods to Congress members so they can understand the consumer rights they might trample on. You can help IPAction.org is effort by donating.

As reported by the EFF, CEA (Consumer Electronics Association) is trying to combat these moves by running an PSA in some Washington D.C. newspapers by pointing out that consumers are not pirates.

Technorati Tags: , , ,


210 views

Controlling the user experience: an example of non-control

A great user experience is at the core of Apple’s products. Apple controls the Mac OS and the computer hardware. Apple controls the iPod, the iTunes software, and the iTunes Music Store. For the most part (although you are locked in to the platform, DRM, etc), the user experience is great because Apple controls all aspects. Lets take a look at the opposite end of the spectrum: Sirius Satellite Radio.

First, you have Sirius Radio, the service provider of the satellite service. There is also Sirius branded hardware. The stand-alone units are also known as “plug and play,” to imply that setup is easy. You just plug it in and it works. Sirius’s branding is so ubiquitous that it has caused confusion for consumers. Some Sirius tuners available from Radio Shack may have no branding other than Sirius. So, what brand is it? Sometimes it is Sirius, other times, it is another manufacturer. A customer may know that these other stereos “work with Sirius,” so maybe it is one of them? Some car stereos are “Sirius Ready,” meaning that have the ability to control a special Sirius tuner, but the tuner must be purchased separately. This is not an easy concept for some customers to understand.

Next, you have the various manufactures of the hardware. Sometimes, you have two or three manufacturers of hardware to make one complete system work. “Sirius Ready” car stereos are available from Alpine, Kenwood, JVC, Sony, Panasonic, Clarion, Sanyo and Panasonic. Each manufacture requires its own proprietary tuner unit. To add to the confusion, within a single brand, there are sometimes specific tuners that do not work with specific car stereo models (older stereos will not work with the new tuners). When Sirius launched, each manufacturer was branding, manufacturing, and distributing its own Sirius tuner. Now, Sirius had made Directed Electronics the only manufacturer of these tuners. So, now we have no fewer than three separate entities involved that the customer may need to contact:
-Sirius, the service provider
-the manufacturer of the stereo
-the manufacturer of the Sirius tuner (Directed)
-In some cases, you can replace the supplied Sirius antenna with a Terk Sirius antenna.

When a problem occurs, whom should the customer contact? Could the customer be passed between each different party more than one time? Is there any easy way figure out where the problem exists without taking everything to a dealer or sending everything to its respective manufacturer’s service center?

Sirius support reps do not even understand the difference between the plug-and-play and a Sirius Ready car stereo. When customers call Sirius to activate their accounts, they ask for the ESN or SID (electronic serial number or Sirius ID number, lets pick a name standard) without asking if the customer has a Sirius Ready car stereo or a plug-and-play. In some cases, the customer has a Sirius Ready car stereo without the Sirius tuner, and does not understand the Sirius Ready concept.

XM Satellite Radio seems to push their plug-and-play radios more than their XM Ready radios, which I could only find a couple of on the XM website. Did they understand that the user experience is better if you don’t have to explain what “XM Ready” means? Maybe. And I say this because they have an XM tuner called the XM Direct that is compatible with most Sirius Ready car stereos. They are using Sirius’s “integrated” solution against Sirius, for yet another layer of customer confusion, thanks to XM.

The plug-and-play units can usually be used in a home or in a car. There are usually special kits that allow it to be used in each one. One expects that these accessories would be available for years to come. This is not the case. Some of these plug-and-play units are made so inexpensively that they are not repairable; some have no replacement parts. So, when a defect is discovered when it is under the warranty, it is replaced. When it is outside of the warranty, the customer is S.O.L. The least the customer could do is buy a new tuner or a new kit to work with their existing piece. But are these available over a year later? Usually not. By law, parts need to be available for a unit for seven years, but apparently this means only if spare parts are made available, and apparently this does not apply to accessories required to operate the unit. I guess Sirius (or one of their radio manufacturing partners) just wants you to buy a new one. What a great user experience.

This last point does not have to do with control of the hardware/service combination, but just another pain point that a customer may have as a result of the manufacturer not putting the user experience first.

Sirius, fix your problems, seriously. There is competition from every angle: iPod and iTMS, subscription services like Yahoo Music, Napster, Rhapsody, and free music licensed under CC featured in podcasts. These all use an open standard that will never be discontinued: audio output to audio input connection. They do not rely on satellite reception. They all allow for a wider choice of music.

Update 8/2/206:
Apparently this example has been written about in a book that compares XM’s and Sirius’s strategies. More here.

Technorati Tags: , , ,


962 views

The Home Satellite Radio Killer: Pandora + Squeezebox

Via blogsicle.net via New York Times, automatically personalized playlist music streaming site Pandora.com is now compatible with a hardware streaming device, the Squeezebox.

In my opinion, this makes Sirius and XM home tuners/service obsolete. No need to mount an antenna on your roof pointing in a specific direction. No need to sit through commercials or songs you do not like (there were no commercials in the beta). The sound quality of Pandora is better. No need to pay $13 a month. When Pandora was in private beta over the summer, I tried it, and I think they said it was $35 for an entire year. $13 x 12 months is around $160 a year. Yea for disruptive business plans!

Of course the only (an I mean only, as in just 1) advantage satellite radio has over streaming radio is that satellite radio is portable.

So I can get streaming radio from Pandora on the Squeezbox. If I can get any video podcast delivered to my TiVo, I’ll be in content 2.0 heaven!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,


547 views

TiVo and Video Podcasts

I am not much of a TV person. I have one, but I never turn it on. I am a podcast listener and a blog reader. Right now, you can download the Rocketboom video podcast to your Tivo. Tivo is coming out with a service where you can stream podcasts. Here is what I want. I want to subscribe to Rocketboom, DiggNation, and any other video podcast I like. Then, when I come home from work, anything that has been released has downloaded to my Tivo and I can just watch them. I don’t have a Tivo now. But if thus feature became available, buying a Tivo would be my top priority. I hope I would not have to pay for anything since I am not recording regular TV. I know I am probably in the minority but I don’t care. Or am I? How many Digg users are there? At least 60,000. And how many in the Twit army? 100,000? And don’t forget about the long tail. TiVo could pump out contextual ads to geeks they would actually care about. Tivo does need to try and stretch its market share.

Update 2/25/2006
I was right.
http://www.podcastingnews.com…people_want_vid.html
http://www.videopodcastingnews.com…consumers-want-video-podcasts-on-their-tvs
http://www.marketwire.com…_b1?release_id=109920

Update 5/9/2006
Another step closer.
TiVo hooks up with Internet video and ad sales service

Update 11/14/2006
Closer yet.
Coming Soon via Your TiVo: Internet Video on Television
Via Techmeme

Update 1/4/2007
Evan Young of TiVo Discusses the Details of the new TiVoCast Service.

Update 8/19/2007
If you want to watch video podcasts on your TV, you should probably get an AppleTV. Here is a comparison of the TiVo Series 3 and AppleTV. You cannot watch any podcast you want to on a TiVo Series 3, but you can with an AppleTV.

Update 3/15/08:
How to get YouTube on a TiVo.