Monthly Archive for October, 2005



228 views

RCA’s HDTV Website

http://tv.rca.com/en-US/Home.html

RCA is hawking a Dummies book: HDTV for Dummies on the HDTV section of their site. On the same page there is a SDTV logo with the slogan “Digital TV for Everyone.” I think this slogan is another way that the CE industry is continuing to perpetuate the confusion of HDTV by applying marketing spin. Of course, SDTV is plain old TV (standard definition television). You could connect a digital device to it such as a digital cable box, satellite receiver, or TiVo, but none of this is necessarily HDTV. Digital does not mean HDTV.



147 views

Splogbusters Part 2

There is some speculation that sploggers are employing people in third-world countries to type in catchpa. This is probably done by pulling the images from the Blogger blog admin and presenting them in another pages so that the catchpa image and filed are displayed in manner where it is easy to read the image and type in the text. Why not block catchpa images from being displayed on other sites using this method?

I presume this is the same method used by servers like Angelfire that you see sometimes when someone tires to post an image from one site to another, and the image that is shown is a notice that it has been blocked for bandwidth reasons.



238 views

Solving the Blogger.com Splog Problem in 3 Steps

The main problem I see with splogs is the poisoning of Technorati results by Blogger.com/Blogspot splogs talked about here, here, and here.
Here is my proposal.

Organizations such as Technorati, Bloggroling, Pubsub, Blogpulse, and, Rojo, Ice Rocket, Feedster and Bloglines, BlogDigger, should all create a Blogger.com OPML whitelist. This will contain Blogger.com blogs that have a certain threshold number of inbound links, hits, ranked high, or whatheaveyou. Next, Technorati has a feature where you could subscribe to an OPML whitelist of any/all of the organizations above.

Blogger.com blogs that are not on the whitelist can then be viewed (optionally by the user) by the Technorati users in a separate area (not in their main results) and they can be markers as exceptions to the blacklist, or to ignore them if they wish. Next to the ignore button, it will show the number of other Technorati users that are also blocking/ignoring this blog. This will help the other users decide they want to block this possible splog from their results as well. After a blog reaches a certain threshold of Technorati user blocks, it can appear in a Technorati user created Blogger.com OPML blacklist (which a Technorati user can also subscribe to).
After a blog reaches a certain threshold of Technorati users accepting a blog that is not on their subscribe whitelist, it can be promoted to the Technorati Blogger.com OPML whitelist (which a Technorati user can also subscribe to).

Technorati can also create the ability to subscriber to a Blogger.com OPML blacklist that can be generated by and organizations like SplogReporter.com.

Meanwhile, Google will spider the Blogger.com blogs that are not on the whitelists of the OPML of the organizations listed above and/or were reported by the SplogReporter.com OPML blacklist, and first determine what language they are in. Once Google has figured out what each language the blog is in, it will then make an AI bot that look for text that does not make grammatical sense, and mark it as possible splog. It could also look for links to pages with a ridiculous number of AdSense ads. Google will send an e-mail to the Blogger.com account holders asking them to respond to the e-mail because it is a suspect splog. If there is no reply after two weeks, the splog is deleted, but with the ability to bring it back within two months if it is found to be a real blog, even though it:
-made no grammatical sense
-had no or a very low number of links to it
-was linking to more than one page with a crazy number of AdSense ads
-did not get an e-mail response back from the blogger for two weeks.

Another thing Google can do is look for e-mail addresses registering more than one blog in Blogger.com, and treat these as suspect splogs. And, it could look for AdSense users who have more than a couple Blogger.com account, and treat these as suspect splogs.

In the end, a splogger could still get their splog though to the blogosphere, but it will be a lot of work. They could sign up with Technorati and poison the whitelists and blacklists to some degree, but they are just one person.



146 views

I am learning Ruby and then Ruby on Rails

If you check my del.icio.us you will notice all of my bookmarks on the Ruby language.  I have installed Ruby on my Mac and I am following along in Chris Pine’s tutorial. The last language I learned was HyperTalk from Apple’s HyperCard about 15 years ago when I was 15.  I was writing totally self taugh and made a ton of stacks, mainly Manhole-like games (most more complicated than Manhole).  Since I was not that good at math, I did not get into any other languages.  What a shame.  I got into must production, midi, recording engineering, and sound design for the next 15 years.  That was fun, but I am now looking for something new.  I am writing this again from Flock, and really digging the link tool, I don’t have to write HTML markup.



272 views

Flock beta relased today

I am writing this blog post from the Flock application in Mac OSX to see what it does. (edit) I am writing this sentence from my blog to set the category, add a trackback UIR from TechCrunch, (my first time using the trackback feature on my blog) and spell check. I sure these features will be available in the future.



233 views

Planned Obsolescence and Cheap Design of Consumer Products are Dead Strategies in the Face of Social Media

The type of planned obsolescence I am talking about is regarding compatibility and interoperability, not how a device is made obsolete because of technological advances. I am not talking about when a major change happens after a standard has been set for years. The change I am referring to is designed to lock out legacy hardware or software that could be compatible. For the most part, this may go unnoticed by the customers in any given industry, since it may be on a per user basis. But today with blogs and message boards, behavior like this is reported in minutes on sites like Digg.com. Corporate behaviors such as planned obsolescence should be viewed as disingenuous to the user base, and the collective knowledge of the users can come to their own conclusions regarding the motives, and see through flase excuses such as technological advances.

The trend toward emergent online community is a good reason for companies to invest more into design, usability, and durability of their products. Today’s users may be thinking, “Surely, such a large company has invested enough thought into a product that it must measures up to my standards so I can do only light research,” only to find out after the purchase that it does not meet expectations.

If the excuse is: long design cycles with not enough time to change, it only takes a small and determined upstart to differentiate and compete by creating a system with shorter design cycles. While it seems older companies may be hip to new features and new trends in their products, they are slow to notice new ideas about marketing, supply chain, and consumer exceptions. Such companies tend base future success on past success and ignore or not notice the fact that the marketplace has changed. Young companies cannot afford not to be agile, while older companies are so entrenched in bureaucracies that it takes forever to get anything done. Smart companies will listen to ideas from employees at any level, and even charge young employees with thinking of fresh, new, radical ideas that management can pass through. Planned obsolescence and bad design should be on the chopping block, and it is the upwardly mobile new hire that will make type of suggestion and have to weather through the storm of entrenched bozos.



205 views

Details On Non-Features

In the trend of full disclosure and transparency, I think there may come a time where a vendor has to inform costumers what their product or service does not have an particular feature (only when it is a feasible feature or service). This may seem to go against traditional marketing, but remember, business-to-consumer interactions are going through a huge change. Take for example Progressive Insurance, and this is very progressive (hence the name). Now I don’t know if they have terms they try to hide in fine print, but they do list the price of their competitors on their own site, which is close to the spirit of full disclosure and transparency.

A company should only want to sell to the right customer as noted in “It’s Not The Big That Eat The Fast That Eat the Slow” by Jason Jennings and Laurence Haughton, it is important to sell only to the right customer. Selling to the wrong customer can end up costing you more than the sale’s revenue. A customer could assume you product or service has a certain feature, find out that it doesn’t and then tell all their friends that it is worthless because it does not have this feature. It could be a niches feature, or it could be a feature that most people it want. It doesn’t matter which. You, as the seller were better of informing this customer that your product or service does not have this feature and not buy it then have them buy it and find out later.

Unless some new competitor comes along, if you did your due-diligence, you product or service will probably continue to sell and meet the needs of thousands or perhaps millions of customers (depending on your market segment). That is why vendors make products and services available with varying features at different price (another example of the Long Tail). So, if this advice of selling only to the right customer is paired with the trend of disclosure and transparency, I think we may see details on non-features. Otherwise, it may appear that the vendor is trying to deceive the customer. You could try to put the blame back on the customer for not doing their due-diligence, but disclosure of non-features is easier, and does not place blame on your customer. It is easier for a vendor to point out that they disclosed a non-feature list rather than explaining that if it was not listed then it must not be a feature.



713 views

FreeMySpace.com is Misguided

See Free MySpace.com’s MySpace profile or FreeMySpace.com

There are a couple people who think that the acquisition of MySpace by News Corp means that they will start charging. Why would MySpace charge users? I’m afraid that these passionate people are a little misguided. The more users MySpace.com has, the more they can charge their advertising clients.

Think of MySpace.com as a billboard on the side of the freeway. Thousands of people see it everyday. Would you charge people to look at it? No. You are just there to use the freeway, and as a consequence, you happen to see this billboard since you need to look at the road and other cars anyway.

The internet is the new medium for a certain segment of the population, and News Corp recognized this. Now, they have a new outlet to push that advertising messages to that segment. The suggestion that the users need will not be considered is ridiculous. MySpace has added several new features recently. Remember when Friendster got big around mid 2003? It was all the rage. But the Friendster team did not like faksteres, was slow, and was not that customizable. Suddenly, everyone stops using Friendster and goes to MySpace because it lets them do things that they could not on Friendster such as customize pages, and ran a lot faster. If MySpace suddenly becomes unpopular because they start doing something users don’t like (such as limit the number of friends you can have, deleting fake profiles, or charging), another company will easily come up with an application to accommodate these users. Us users can switch very easily as we saw with all Friendster users running over to MySpace. Do you really think that News Corp does not understand that they must do whatever possible to keep users?

I think anyone following Web 2.0, The Long Tail, and new marketing can see this as a no brainer. I guess the average MySpace user does not have as much marketing savvy as the rest of us.

Update: 5/15/09
It looks like freemyspace.com has been taken down, but I found this in the Google cache. I thought I would preserve it here in case it is gone later.

MYSPACE.COM FOUNDER ISSUES REPORT FINDING NEWS CORP.’S MYSPACE

ACQUISITION DEFRAUDED SHAREHOLDERS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

Report Calls for Further Investigation into Self Dealing, Insider Trading, Options Acceleration and Unfair Process Related to Purchase

Brad Greenspan, founder of Myspace.com, today issued an online report at Freemyspace.com that details how Intermix Media, Inc.’s sale of Myspace intentionally defrauded shareholders billions of dollars. Saying it is “one of the largest merger and acquisition scandals in U.S. history,” Greenspan is calling for further investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the United States Department of Justice and the United States Senate Committee on Finance. Greenspan served as chairman and chief executive officer when Myspace was created by Intermix.

“The answer to how News Corp. was fortunate enough to buy one of the largest and most valuable Internet companies for pennies on the dollar is now clear,” said Intermix’s largest individual shareholder and Myspace founder Brad Greenspan. “I expect as the authorities get their arms around what happened, that this transaction will be unwound and Myspace will be independent. An independent Myspace is significantly better for its users and shareholders.”

“For the first time the public can read what took place behind the scenes and how shareholders were blatantly misled into voting for a quick and unfair sale to News Corp.,” continued Greenspan. “Deliberate steps were taken to withhold and manipulate information; money was improperly gained and laws were broken. It is my hope that regulatory bodies will begin their investigations quickly before evidence is destroyed.”

Greenspan utilized a variety of sources for The Myspace Report, including the two highest non-director senior executives at Intermix, chief financial officer Lisa Terrill and chief operating officer Sherm Atkinson, financial analysts, and Kroll, Inc., a golden risk consulting company.

The report shows Intermix chief executive officer Richard Rosenblatt knew before the transaction that Myspace was well on its way to becoming worth at least $20 billion.

“In addition to Rosenblatt’s stunning and incriminating emails, the two highest non-director senior executives, chief financial officer Lisa Terrill and chief operating officer Sherm Atkinson, have come forward through their legal counsel indicating significant breaches of fiduciary duty by Rosenblatt and the directors as part of the News Corp. transaction,” continued Greenspan.

The report concludes that certain Intermix board members and senior executives, led by Rosenblatt, blatantly deceived shareholders into voting for a quick sale to News Corp. in exchange for broad protection from a string of prior corporate misdeeds and Rosenblatt’s understanding that he would share in $20 billion in value post-transaction via his new role at News Corp.

* “This is your show and I am looking forward to supporting the 20B dream !”

– Rosenblatt (Intermix) e-mail to Ross Levinsohn (News Corp.) on July 13, at
11:49 a.m. (four days before signing the transaction with News Corp.)

* “Snipet of the press playa. You will be famous… now 20B”

– Rosenblatt (Intermix) e-mail to Ross Levinsohn (News Corp.) on July 18, at
8:19 p.m. (on the day the transaction was announced to the public)

Rosenblatt’s scheme was helped in large part because Intermix hid Myspace revenue from shareholders in a blatent violation of FAS 131 (segment reporting disclosure). Shareholders were not aware that Myspace’s revenue was growing at a 1200 percent annualized rate and increasing. Shareholder’s were forced to trust the recommendation of Intermix’s Board and were under the impression Myspace was unable to turn its massive traffic into revenues.

“A public company that refuses to tell shareholders the revenue of its most valuable asset flies in the face of what it means to be a public company” said Greenspan.

Approximately six-months after the deal closed, News Corp. disclosed to analysts that Myspace was tracking at $250 million in revenue in 2006 and announced an advertising deal for MySpace with Google for $900 million dollars. Peter Chernin of News Corp. was quoted by the Financial Times on Aug 7, 2006:

“In one fell swoop we have paid off two-thirds of our Internet investments. We have gotten a 70 percent premium on our Myspace investment and are now playing with house money.”

“If Intermix had abided by FAS 131, shareholders would have been able to track the revenue and growth of Myspace and known the property was on pace to hit the eye popping numbers we are now seeing,” said Greenspan. “Myspace didn’t magically start generating revenue after the News Corp. transaction, its revenue and growth were tracking to reach $250 million before the acquisition.”

Among the report’s findings are:

Intermix specifically chose not to initiate an auction or shopping process as mandated by the law (Revlon Duties). Rosenblatt, VantagePoint’s Andrew Sheehan, News Corp., and both banking firm’s, collusion against Viacom’s efforts to give Intermix a bid including misinforming Viacom of the timing for making a bid, directing Thomas Weisel to stop facilitating Viacom’s bid, and hiding from Morgan Stanley, Viacom’s banker, as Intermix and News Corp. rushed to sign the deal.

Intermix CEO Richard Rosenblatt’s $12 per share sale price for Myspace was not based on an outside valuation from the investment banking community. In May 2005 Deutsche Bank outlined for Intermix executives that taking Myspace public could provide value in the $1.028 – $1.7 billion range.

Rosenblatt knew Myspace was on track to become a $20 billion property and purposely withheld this information from shareholders to accelerate the transaction as well as 60 percent of his stock options at closing for a personal gain of $20 million.

“News Corp.’s valuation has increased by $12 billion since the transaction occurred just one year ago, and there are several independent analysts today that agree that Myspace is worth tens of billions of dollars,” Greenspan added. “It is time everyone knew the truth about the ‘hijacking’ of Myspace and the individuals responsible for this eye popping theft .”

A complaint about the involved parties is pending in Federal Court.

About Myspace and Brad Greenspan

Among the Intermix properties acquired by News Corp. was Myspace.com, a social networking Web site with Web profiles, blogs, instant messaging, e-mail, music downloads, photo galleries, classified listings and chat rooms that allows users to create their own online community. MySpace.com has more than 100 million registered users and is rapidly growing.

Brad Greenspan, founder of Intermix Media where he led the creation of Myspace.com. Currently heserves as an investor and strategic business advisor for successful start-up companies in high-growth markets. He invests capital and resources that enable companies to meet their short- and long-term business objectives. Greenspan recently launched BroadWebAsia, which is focused on the Chinese internet market.